Monthly Archives: June 2012

Quick Take: Submarine

Submarine (2011)

Written and Directed by Richard Ayoade

I drowned in excess quirk watching Submarine, a cloying coming-of-age dramedy about a young teen who attempts to lose his virginity and save his parents’ marriage at the same time.

First time writer-director Richard Ayoade has a very distinctive voice, which is impressive. Not all novice filmmakers can express their voice so clearly in their debut motion pictures. But my problem is, I didn’t like his voice. At all. It’s relentlessly offbeat and idiosyncratic, making it impossible for me to give a damn about Oliver or his folks. (Never mind his would-be lover, Jordana, one of the most annoying characters I’ve seen on screen all year).

I’m not sure what I’m missing here. The reception of Submarine is fairly upbeat. Then again, in more ways than one, the film reminds me of the work of Wes Anderson, who is revered as a creative individual and whose appeal I still do not get.

But what do I know?

D+

9 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: We Bought a Zoo

We Bought a Zoo (2011)

Written by Aline Brosh McKenna and Cameron Crowe
Directed by Cameron Crowe

Not exactly what I would expect from Cameron Crowe. But the truth is, the man has never made a bad film. Some of his films are criminally underrated (Vanilla Sky and Elizabethtown all deserve second looks). We Bought a Zoo feels like his least personal film to date, but that doesn’t make it any less worthwhile. It’s a cookie cutter studio film, for sure, but it’s a nicely handled one that features a sweet cast, a leisurely pace and a harmless way of spending a lazy Saturday afternoon.

There’s nothing great about We Bought A Zoo except for one thing: Matt Damon. This guy consistently delivers solid, oftentimes amazing work. I really believe Damon has become one of our modern-day great actors, among the best of the best. He will take mediocre material and just run away with it. He commands your attention. He earns your tears. The final scene of We Bought a Zoo should not have worked. But Matt Damon, master class actor that he is, completely sells it.

B

2 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: Shame

Shame (2011)

Written by Abi Morgan and Steve McQueen
Directed by Steve McQueen

Addiction is a debilitating disease. It drives you to do unspeakable things with disregard to your loved ones, your job, your health. Sex addiction is not something that is frequently covered in movies, but every year there seems to be a new film about addiction to drugs, greed or a life of crime. Steve McQueen takes a fresh spin on this subgenre with Shame, a taboo-busting (for America anyway) drama about a man (Michael Fassbender in a commanding performance) who lives and breathes sex. He consumes online interactive porn, engages in casual sex almost daily, and masturbates compulsively. And it eats him up inside. He struggles with it. And you wouldn’t know about his addiction if you met him on the street. His coworkers and friends suspect nothing. The only family we know of is his sister (Carey Mulligan) but she has issues of her own to contend with.

Shame is a dark, difficult film, but it’s actually easy to feel empathy towards this guy. Everyone is hiding something about themselves that they don’t want anyone else to know about. Shame about your secret is an inherently universal feeling. To some degree, everyone experiences it.

Fassbender continues to deliver performances that would define any other actor as a breakout. He is constantly breaking out. You look at him in Hunger, Fish Tank, his stint in Inglourious Basterds and each time you say “This guy is going to be a star.” He’s not quite there yet and Shame won’t put him over the top – the film is too dark and raw for most casual moviegoers. But for all of us who have seen his work, we’re waiting for the other shoe to drop. Michael Fassbender has proven time and again that he has what it takes to be an A-list movie star.

A-

12 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

TV Report Card: Winter/Spring 2012

Summer is here! You know what that means? Most of my shows have wrapped up for the year. I’m sad to say that it hasn’t been a thrilling run since two of my favorite shows ended way back in Feb/March (Parenthood, The Walking Dead). This made the last 2-3 months feel a little bit lackluster. With the exception of some strong comedies, there was nothing on my DVR that I had to see immediately. Nothing worth reading about the next day. When The Walking Dead ended, I missed having a water cooler show. That will change soon when summer rolls around and brings us some goodies. Breaking Bad‘s final season (part one) will kick off in July (it’s my first season watching the show live!) and season three of the superb, experimental dramedy, Louie, begins at the end of June. Also, The Newsroom debuts on HBO at the end of the month as well.

Can. Not. Wait.

Despite my misgivings about the lack of fireworks later in the season, there were still some big doings on TV this spring. I started watching not one but two “reality” programs (Shark Tank, Savage U). The horror! A long-running show bit the dust for good (Desperate Housewives). A promising debut blossomed into something pretty special (New Girl). Some of my old-time favorites proved to be smooth, well-oiled machines (Grey’s Anatomy, Parks and Recreation). And on the opposite end of the spectrum, two shows are literally hanging by a thread (Glee, Californication).

Let’s get to it.

The Walking Dead

Season 2: A
Series to date: A-

After a strong but meandering start of the series, The Walking Dead came into its own during the devastating, tension-filled 2-part second season. Many folks complained about the barn setting and how the characters were simply standing around talking about their feelings for weeks on end. It’s true, that’s what they did. But you know, that’s far more interesting to me than going from setting to setting, killing one horde of zombies after another. That would have gotten very old very quickly.

Instead, the writers crafted a nifty little character study where we learned about what makes these people tick. We still know too little about T-Dog and Carol, but they have survived the season and there’s still a good chance the writers will beef up their stature. Gone are Dale, Shane, and a bulk of the Greene clan, and while some of them will be missed, their send-offs are necessary in adding new dimensions to the rest of the cast.

Standout moments of the season include: the grisly and utterly shocking discovery of Sophia; Shane’s grappling with the guilt of Otis’s death; and Dale’s heartfelt, passionate plea to end the senseless killing. I also really enjoyed watching Daryl turn into an intensely likable hardass over the course of the season. And ditto for Herschel going from a territorial protector to a willing team player.

Season 3 couldn’t come any sooner.

Parenthood

Season 3: A
Series to date: A

Ugh. Can this show break my heart any more than it already does? Jason Katims is a master juggler of storylines. He and his ridiculously talented writing team (who are also responsible for the dearly departed Friday Night Lights) give each member of the Braverman clan some time to shine. They have all had remarkable arcs this season.

Zeek mends his contentious relationship with his mother. Sarah builds her bond with Mr. Cyr (the always pleasant Jason Ritter, who I hope joins the cast full-time since his pilot was not picked up). Julia and Joel struggle with the adoption process, which led to some surprising revelations toward the end of the season. Drew has a girlfriend (yay!), and delightfully, awkwardly comes of age. Amber got a new job, only to fall for her boss. Despite that predictable turn of events, the story redeems itself as she and Bob Little rise above the situation. Also, I really loved the small moments between Amber and her cousin, Max, who has Asperger’s. Amber is the only one who truly understands him.

And Max, who has been adapting to school with some difficulty, had some really strong moments this year. The fallout with Jabbar and his running away gave Max Burkholder his most powerful performances since the series began. What an excellent young actor. His folks, Adam and Kristina, are exhaustively attempting to keep everything afloat, including the birth of their new baby girl, Nora, and starting new jobs (Adam with Crosby at The Luncheonette, a perfect excuse to get the great Peter Krause and Dax Shepard in as many scenes together as possible, and Kristina with running Bob Little’s campaign). Their daughter Haddie had less to do this year, since she sadly ended her relationship with Alex (Michael B. Jordan, who really needs to come back to the show). Her expectations needed to be in check, however, when she discovered that her folks wouldn’t be able to afford to send her off to Cornell.

Heartbreaking, heartwarming, endlessly relatable stuff. Parenthood is the best show no one is watching.

Modern Family

Season 3: A-
Series to date: A

Modern Family never fails to make me laugh every week. The writing is so fresh and sharp. The cast gels perfectly; they’ve been firing on all cylinders since the pilot. After three seasons, there is still not a weak performer in the bunch. Not all story structures work, but at this point, that hardly matters (for now), as long as the laughs are there.

However, the show is beginning to show signs of age. These wobbly story structures will eventually collapse and grow more far-fetched as the series runs its course. The blessing of the show is that everyone is so damned talented. The curse is that these characters do not evolve. Their dynamics do not change. If I turned on a rerun of Modern Family, I wouldn’t be able to tell if the episode was from season 1 or season 3. Look at Friends or Roseanne, two of my favorite sitcoms. New relationships are forged. New life-changing struggles are introduced every season. The characters evolve, they grow over time. With Modern Family, it’s like nothing ever happens to these people. That can be troublesome because I don’t want them to become caricatures.

Gloria’s pregnancy reveal at the end of the season may, in fact, reinvigorate the show. It may be just what is needed to start season 4 with fresh material and new challenges. But more twists and dynamics of this kind need to keep fueling this show in the long run. Right now, though, Modern Family is working wonderfully, and I hope the creators don’t run out of gas before it’s too late.

Parks and Recreation

Season 4: A-
Series to date: A-

After the first season, Parks and Recreation established the characters and made a few tweaks as it tried to find its voice. The show was off and running during seasons 2 and 3, which were the high points of the series.  Week after week, this gang never failed to make me laugh. The characters were so well-rounded, the dramatic stakes were heartfelt, and the delivery was pitch-perfect. Season 4 was no different.

Some highlights: The on-again off-again relationship between Ann Perkins and Tom Haverford was ingeniously played out because it was treated like a joke, though the characters were not exactly in on it. These two do NOT belong together and this show knows it. Also, April and Andy continue to grow as individuals, with him going to college and her having more work to do in the office. But they still remain lazy, lovable creatures who have such deep affection for one another. It’s also nice to see a new side of Chris, who is always optimistically chipper. His downward spiral showed us how good of an actor Rob Lowe really is.

The one thing I wasn’t too crazy about this season was the balance between Leslie’s running for office and her workload at the Parks and Rec department. I thought a little too much time was devoted to her campaigning. Now that she won (spoiler alert!) maybe we’ll see more stories involving the improvement of Pawnee, which is where the heart of the show lies.

Shark Tank

Season 3: A-
Series to date: A-

I had seen bits and pieces of Shark Tank during their first two seasons, and I was intrigued. But because I have some kind of an aversion towards “reality” programming, I just couldn’t commit. Well, it so happened that I watched an entire hour earlier this season, and I couldn’t get enough of it. I had room on my DVR and decided to become a full-time viewer. What an addictive series. The premise is simple: entrepreneur wannabes pitch their wild ideas to five business-savvy investors who wish to make their empires bigger than ever. These billionaire investors — sharks, for dramatic effect — fight one another to score the best deal that will make them richer. The foundation is solid. The sharks are entertaining. And, for better or worse, the businessmen and women who sell their ideas with passion and vigor are what makes America a shining beacon of opportunity.

New Girl

Season 1: B+

“Who’s that girl, who’s that girl, who’s that girl? It’s Jess!” Wow, this show has come a long way since it premiered way back in September. After sampling five or six episodes, my wife and I were on the fence about continuing it. Sure, it was cute but it was so offbeat and only occasionally funny. Curiosity kept luring us back to it every week. And I’m so glad we never stopped.

I think it was around the time when CeCe and Schmidt started sleeping together that the show went from a mildly entertaining sitcom to must-see TV. Watching that relationship develop was pretty special, thanks mostly to the show’s MVP, Max Greenfield, whose “Schmitty Cents”, a metrosexual douchebag with heart, has evolved into a wholly interesting, full-fledged character. The show simply drags without him in the front and center. Nick (Jake Johnson) and Jess (Zooey Deschenel, the one who drew me to the show in the first place) have also become more defined and less grating as the season progressed. Winston (the game Lamorne Morris) needs some more work. I feel like they were just beginning to figure him out once the season ended.

I’m really looking forward to seeing this gang return in the fall.

Savage U

Season 1: B+

Another “reality” show on my DVR. What’s happening to me!? I would not be giving this MTV half-hour a moment’s notice if it weren’t for Dan Savage. Savage is a sex advice columnist – and a very good one too – whose podcast gets weekly play on my iPhone. The man tells you everything you need to know about relationships and sex. He’s the male, American, gay version of Ann Landers, but readers/listeners of all walks of life can enjoy Savage’s easy-going, candid nature.

He took his expertise to college campuses around the country and MTV went with him. Savage is joined by his producer and friend Lauren Hutchinson (a sweetheart and a charmer), and together, they answer questions about dating, masturbation, STDs, threesomes, S&M, bisexuality, you name it. Nothing is off-limits here, and the result is a refreshing, wide-eyed look at topics that are not for those who are shy in nature.

My only wish is that Savage U were not so damn short (with commercials, it’s only 20 minutes!). I hope it sticks around. I can never get enough of this guy.

Grey’s Anatomy

Season 8: B+
Series to Date: B

Wow, 8 years! This show has gone through some serious ups and downs over the course of 8 seasons. Izzie’s final season was the show’s lowest point; when she left, I thought “good riddance.” It took some time for the show to rediscover itself, and this season was the show’s finest since the early days. Focusing on the residents’ fifth (and final) year at Mercy Hospital provided plenty of drama. The pressures of passing the big test (masterfully executed towards the end of the season), landing a job, moving to a different part of the country, all while balancing their requisite relationship problems and emotional caseloads — all nicely played out here.

However, the season finale, which saw our core group in a plane crash, reeked of manipulation and lazy plot mechanics. I’m sure the intention was to get our characters in a new emotional place for season 9 (a sort of reboot, if you will). Still, it’s a small misstep in an otherwise very compelling season of a show that once showed signs of weakness and has since found a new lease on life.

Desperate Housewives

Season 8: B
Series Final Grade: B

After 8 wildly uneven seasons, Desperate Housewives should not have lasted this long. There’s nothing intelligent or redeeming about this show. The characters are inconsistent; the arcs are predictable; the season-long mysteries are long-winded and convoluted. In fact, it’s so easy to be critical of this show, and I found myself shaking my head in contempt more often than not. I cannot tell you how many times I almost wanted to end it.

But Marc Cherry and his team managed to bring me back, season after season. While it was never an A-level series or “must see TV,” it was actually a fun soap opera that was easy on the eyes and easier on the brain. It was comfort food that I usually felt guilty about consuming. It required no thinking. If I left the room to get something, I didn’t rewind the show to see what I missed. I folded a lot of laundry during Desperate Housewives.

I’m glad the show ended when it did. I won’t miss it, but I will miss seeing Felicity Huffman on the airwaves. I’ve been a huge fan of hers since the days of Sports Night. Marcia Cross’s Bree Van DeKamp was actually my least favorite character when the show launched back in 2004, but as the show progressed, I began to like her more and more. I could always take it or leave it with Teri Hatcher’s Susan Delfino and Eva Longoria’s Gabrielle Solis; their personas were always about as subtle as jack hammers when it came to characterizations and plot developments.

So long, Wisteria Lane. It was kinda, sorta fun while it lasted, but don’t let the door hit your cleavage on the way out.

How I Met Your Mother

Season 7: B-
Series to date: B

The damn title is bringing this show down. After 7 years of leaving tantalizing clues and teases, the central concept of How I Met Your Mother is now a complete joke. The amount of wrenches they have thrown this series-long arc is ridiculous. Even Lost knew when to put an end to it! And it’s too bad because a) this cast is awesome and b) most often than not, the show is very, very funny.

Not long ago, maybe two or three seasons ago, I vowed not to care about who the mother is anymore. It’s pointless. The show is about the journey, not the endgame. But the creators of the show are making it increasingly difficult to care about Ted and the women he dates, including (and especially) Robin. I love Cobie Smulders. She has created a dryly funny and completely believable character in Robin Scherbatzky. But this season’s big final twist resulted in nothing more than character assassination. Throwing her back together with Ted makes zero sense for either character and brings us further and further from the show’s “endgame.”

All that said, this wasn’t the show’s finest year, not by a long shot. But I did enjoy Lily and Marshall’s transformation from Manhattanite yuppies to parents-to-be Long Islanders. And Barney had some really good moments with his new gal pal Quinn (nicely played by Becki Newton). She’s good for him. It’s nice to finally see Barney so well-matched. And Ted is… Well, still Ted. I’ve always loved him and Josh Radnor’s consistently charming portrayal, so no real complaints here.

They just need to stop jerking us around. Either forget about the mother and move on, or start folding her into the show, like, NOW.

Californication

Season 5: C
Series to date: B

I absolutely love David Duchovny. Because of him, and him alone, I will never stop watching Californication, no matter how clumsy it becomes. No matter how shallow, no matter how sophomoric, no matter how lazy… I will be loyal to the show til the bitter end. It’s strange. The first three seasons have been pretty spectacular. The sexual misadventures of Hank Moody and his friends were frank, funny, and no-holds-barred adult programming. It was dirty in such a good way. But all that sex stuff gets old after a while, and I was returning to the show every week because I really dug the characters. Take the Runkles, for example. Marcy and Charlie were so dysfunctional, but their love for one another was so deep-rooted and palpable. Relationships in “sitcoms” tend not to be multi-faceted, but the Runkles were as real as any couple I’ve seen on TV.

But the last two seasons, and especially this one, our favorite characters have been a joke. Caricatures. Californication has, and will always be, centered around Hank Moody, and he’s still our favorite anti-hero, the ultimate fuckup who insists that his relationship with his daughter is the most important in his life. There’s plenty of juicy material for Hank Moody (and Duchovny never fails to play him so well), but it seems that the writers have given up on everyone else. The Runkles are no more, and separately, they have sunken to such low depths. Could they possibly be more desperate and pathetic? Stu Baggs (the great Stephen Tobolowsky) is a one-joke character, and let’s not even go into the non-threatening antagonist of the season, named Samurai Apocalypse (played by RZA). He snarled, he huffed, and then he laughed it off, only to continue doing so in the exact same manner for 10 episodes. And his girlfriend (Megan Good) is the single most poorly written character in the history of the show. When Kali showed up in the premiere on the airplane, I thought her scenes with Hank generated fireworks. But she turned out to be nothing more than a walking and talking plot device.

Hank and Karen are back together. Hank and Becca have mended fences. Here’s hoping the next season brings the Californication we know and love back on track.

Glee

Season 3: C-
Series to date: C+

After 5 seasons of Californication, Hank Moody is the only character left worth rooting for. After 3 seasons of Glee, there is no one here that I can sink my teeth into. Oh, what a mess this show has become. Every single character has gone from one extreme to another at the convenience of the “theme of the week.” It’s so clearly obvious the writers have written these characters around the songs, and not the other way around. Season 1 was far from perfect, but it was refreshing (and admittedly addictive) to watch these kids at McKinley High sing popular songs while struggling with the challenges of adolescence. As the series progressed, these characters we’ve grown attached to have become stick figures. The storyline involving Quinn’s baby is by far the show’s most disastrous arc. Quinn had become this evil, soulless teenager who conspired to sabotage the relationship between the baby and its adoptive mother (who happens to be Rachel’s birth mom, who happens to strike an affair with Puck, who happens to be the baby’s daddy and Quinn’s on-again off-again lover). This storyline killed any credibility these characters ever had. Quinn later “redeemed” herself only to be struck by a car not long afterwards and I was seriously hoping she did not survive. Needless to say, she did and was dancing on stage in a matter of weeks. Why, of course she did!

I can’t waste my time listing the rest of the cast’s strengths (there aren’t many) and weaknesses (oh, yes, there are a lot). So why do I continue to watch this show? Well, I’m hopeful. This show used to have magic. And there were flashes during this season that showed some promise and some spark. There were stray moments that moved me, almost to tears. I’m also clinging onto the idea that with half the cast graduating, there will be fresh blood in the new season. Maybe Ryan Murphy and his team will inject some sense into the show.

Side note: I haven’t forgiven them for turning Blaine into a boring, oddball character who couldn’t be more out-of-place at this school. He was a breath of fresh air as a recurring part in season 2. But when they moved him into McKinley and made Darren Criss full-time, they essentially sucked the life out of him and buried his appeal.

I hope Kurt Hummel got the hell out of that town and never looked back.

16 Comments

Filed under Crazy About TV, TV Report Card

Quick Take: Life in a Day

Life in a Day (2011)

Directed by Kevin Macdonald, et al

An engrossing documentary about everything and nothing. It celebrates the mundane things in life, like brushing your teeth, eating breakfast and shaving. It takes place on a single day – July 24th, 2010 – and shows us experiences from all parts of the world. The film never stays on a single subject for longer than two minutes. Sometimes the scene will be 5 seconds long. It’s a snapshot, if you will, of what everyone is doing on this given day.

Every tiny thing that you do in life, from the moment you wake up in the morning to the moment you go to sleep at night, defines your existence. Life in a Day explores the universality of our being. We’re all one and the same, aren’t we? We all eat, sleep, love, hate, feel, lust. We all have fears. We all ache. Everyone has suffered loss.

We’re all… human.

B+

6 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: Rampart

Rampart (2011)

Directed by Oren Moverman
Written by James Ellroy and Oren Moverman

Woody Harrelson plays Dave Brown, a police officer with the LAPD. He’s a bigot, he’s sexist, he’s calculating, he’s temperamental. And, well, he’s one of the good guys. Isn’t he?

Rampart is Oren Moverman’s fictional account of a real situation: the Rampart scandal rocked L.A. in the 90′s, where cops alledgedly beat the shit out of their perpetrators. The film is a chronicle of one man against the system. His boss, his lawyer, his ex-wives, his daughters, the media, etc. They all have a beef with Dave Brown. And Dave Brown could not care less.

Harrelson is a force to be reckoned with. It’s a dynamic, muscular performance, probably the best in his career. He crackles with energy. This is his second collaboration with Moverman, whose The Messenger moved me to tears last year. Ben Foster, who earned raves last year in that film, makes a brief appearance here as Brown’s homeless counterpart.

The rest of the all-star cast shines in bit parts, especially Sigourney Weaver and Robin Wright as tough-as-nails professionals who can see right through his shit.

There’s no real plot here. It’s Dave Brown rebelling against the system. Some folks may be turned off by the lack of narrative pull, but the film moves frantically as Brown’s seething hatred towards the world comes to a boil.

One of the year’s best.

A

2 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011)

Directed by Tomas Alfredson
Written by Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan

My brain hurts from watching this movie.

I consider myself to be somewhat smart. Not brilliant, but I do have a college education and some street smarts. I tried so hard to keep up with this film, which intentionally makes it difficult for you to really soak in the intricacies of the labyrinthine plot. About three quarters into the film, I gave up trying to piece together the puzzle and savored the performances and craftsmanship. There’s no doubt Alfredson has a remarkable eye for detail. The film just looks gorgeous, rich in texture and each frame is filled with heavy dread.

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is one of those films that I admired more than I actually enjoyed. I respect it. I acknowledge its beauty and fine craftsmanship. The star power is undeniable.

But I can’t say that I felt a single damn thing when it ended.

C

8 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: The Adventures of Tintin

The Adventures of Tintin (2011)

Directed by Steven Spielberg
Written by Steven Moffat, Edgar Wright and Joe Cornish

Blistering barnacles!

The Adventures of Tintin is proof that Master Spielberg still has what it takes to make a worthy sequel to Indiana Jones. Crystal Skull was missing some crucial elements that made the Indy predecessors work, such as heart, ingenious plotting, a little bit of whimsy and being a shitload of fun. Tintin, I’m glad to say, has all of these in spades.

Where the hell was this film during the Oscars? I’m not disputing Rango‘s win, it’s a fine film, but this one was far more entertaining than most live action films of last year. It deserved a Best Animated Feature nomination, to say the least.

I’m not at all familiar with the popular comic series, so I have no idea if Spielberg and co-producer Peter Jackson botched the material. But what I can tell you is that The Adventures of Tintin completely takes advantage of the motion capture format. It’s a gorgeously fluid adventure tale about a boy journalist and his loyal dog on the hunt for sunken treasure. I love the character of Tintin; he’s smart, selfless and always does right by others. A terrific role model for boys of all ages.

From what I understand, Jackson is helming the sequel. Dude, I’m so on board.

A

4 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

The Great Movies: Finding Nemo

This post was written as part of the Finding Pixar retrospective hosted by Amir from Amiresque. You can find the rest of the series here.

Finding Nemo (2003) is not Pixar’s best film. No, that honor goes to Toy Story. Or is it Toy Story 2? Or wait, maybe it goes to Monsters, Inc.

Shit. I don’t know.

Ratatouille has an insanely high Metacritic score (at 96/100, it’s Pixar’s highest score to date), but it hardly gets any replay action in my house. (I still think its pretty darn special, though). Many folks think that the Cars films (especially its inferior sequel) are the weakest, but my four-year-old son thinks the original is the most ”awesomest” film of all time. His whole world revolves around Lightning McQueen and Doc Hudson. And there are people out there who think that the Toy Story trilogy is cinema’s best triple feature slate, outranking the original Star Wars or Godfather films. And ya know what? I ain’t gonna argue with them.

So does Pixar actually have a Best Film? Ask a crowd of people on the street and you will get a lot of different answers. And that, my friends, is the beauty of Pixar. They have produced a ridiculous amount of great films and you will find someone out there who has a deep affection for at least one of their 13 titles. As a collective bunch, the films of Pixar exemplify the magic and creativity of the Disney brand.

But if I were to harbor a guess and pick a film from Pixar that best defines the animation giant, it would have to be Finding Nemo. I think this is the film that represents Pixar at its best (and worst).

Let’s start with the voice cast. One thing Pixar does best is hire some great voice talent. Hanks and Allen as Buzz and Woody. Newman as Doc Hudson. Ratzenberger as, well, a lot of characters. But in Finding Nemo, the character of Dory is completely and perfectly personified by Ellen DeGeneres. Now, DeGeneres is no Hanks or Newman, but as a forgetful blue-finned tang named Dory, she owns this film. Finding Nemo is filled with dramatic moments and tension-filled adventures, so the gentle and flighty humor provided by DeGeneres gives the film tremendous balance. Albert Brooks, whose too-infrequent presence is always welcome in Hollywood, hits just the right notes as Nemo’s frantic, overprotective dad. You also have Geoffrey Rush, Willem Dafoe and Eric Bana making memorable voice appearances as well.

The animation in Finding Nemo has arguably some of the best artwork in Pixar’s remarkable canon. The Incredibles may have the best action sequences, while the Toy Story films have such an abundance of heart, but Finding Nemo has visuals that pop frame after frame. Watching this film on our 50″ plasma TV is incredibly eye-pleasing. It’s impossible to look away, especially during the jellyfish scene or when the gang gets caught up on the East Australian Current. The attention to detail is staggering, which is no surprise to any Pixar fan. There’s a dreamlike quality to the underwater visuals, an imaginative recapturing of life under the sea.

One problem I had with the film is that there are moments that are too dark for smaller children. Pixar usually does a good job balancing adult themes with children’s sentiments, but Finding Nemo is a little bit off-kilter.  I know not all Pixar films are geared towards the same audience (Ratatouille and WALL-E, for instance, probably resonate more to adults than children), but Finding Nemo is clearly intended for audiences of all ages. Killing the mother (off-screen) in the film’s opening sequence is quite jarring, as well as the introduction of Bruce, the great white shark who attempts to stave off his addiction of eating smaller fish. It’s just a shame that I have to skip past the edgier scenes for my little ones. 

Another criticism that’s common among Pixar detractors is that their stories are cliche-ridden, and that Finding Nemo is Pixar at its most cloyingly predictable. While I do agree that there are some elements of the story that lack originality and surprises, I have to say that it’s perfectly necessary to have some sort of familiar structure when assembling a family picture. Sometimes they get it just right by being wholly original (see WALL-E), but when they fall back to the conventions of screenwriting 101, the picture tends to suffer. (Cars seems to be Pixar’s worst offender of this, though I believe it is this banality of the characters and story that makes Cars so much easier to swallow for smaller kids). Finding Nemo overcomes this obstacle, for the most part, by including character dynamics that feel fresh and even innovative. The heart of the film is not necessarily that of Nemo and his father, Marlin, but actually of Dory and Marlin. Those two characters bring out the best and worst of each other and, during their enlightening exchanges, the writers give them great depth and material that most feature films would envy.

At the time of its release, Finding Nemo was Pixar’s fifth film. The world had already seen Toy Story 1 and 2, A Bug’s Life and Monsters, Inc. Movie-goers and critics had become aware of how talented these animators were. What they didn’t know back in 2003 was that Pixar wasn’t even close to peaking.

But then again, it’s 2012, and we still don’t know if they’ve peaked. They are quite the anomaly, aren’t they?

6 Comments

Filed under Blogathons and Memes, The Great Movies