Monthly Archives: September 2012

TV Report Card: Summer 2012

Ah, the dog days of summer. A misnomer if there ever was one. It was a terrific summer all around for me, especially in the area of television. I used to despise TV during the summer months. The quality and selection were always lacking. But thanks to cable and their non-traditional seasons, I got to enjoy four shows during these hot months. That’s more than I typically watch during this season. But all of these shows were completely worth it.

Breaking Bad

Season 5 (Part 1): A
Series to Date: A+

What can I say about Breaking Bad that I haven’t said already? This is one of the very best shows in television history; easily the best show running on TV now. The show’s penchant for high quality scripts, superb acting and knockout twists continued with this new half-season that did not disappoint. The second half of this final (boo!) season will conclude in summer of 2013 (boo hoo!). I was hesitant to give it a grade at all since it’s technically not a full season. We got 8 sterling episodes this summer, and they were as great as you’d expect from Vince Gilligan and his crack team of writers. But even though all previous seasons got an A+ from me, I need to shave off the + for season 5 for the reason that 8 is just not enough. I felt short-changed. It’s like they took away my favorite meal before I got to finish it. That being said, when I view the second half, I’ll grade the entire 16-episode season as a whole, and we’ll see if I’m full then. I have no doubt I will be more than satisfied. These guys never let me down.

Highlights of this season so far: Skylar’s harrowing descent into the dark side; Walt’s increasingly arrogant behavior (“It’s over when I say it’s over”); the devastating death of an innocent boy and the gang’s grim handling of it; the life and death of Mike Ehrmantraut, one of the show’s very best characters; two gorgeous montages in the mid-season finale – the prison shanking and the 3-month leap forward; and the final jaw-dropping twist that gives new meaning to the word “info dump.” By the way, Hank was severely underused this season, but judging from that twist, he’ll be in full force in the show’s final run of episodes.

Ten months is a long, fucking time.

Louie

Season 3: A
Series to date: A-

Watching Louie is like witnessing an abstract painting come to life. Your emotions are running off in different directions. At heart, Louis C.K. is a comedian and, like his standup, his TV show is designed to make us laugh. But C.K. is also a observer of life who is so finely tuned to his audience’s expectations and feelings. He is so completely and utterly in control of the tone of his show that it’s like watching a master dramatist at work. The season finale – probably the best half hour of TV I have seen all year – had me endlessly chuckling while remaining in awe of how open and raw Louie’s emotions are. When he started crying because the damn doll wasn’t coming together as he’d like it, I felt so exasperated for him. I wanted to hug him. Then the elevator door closed, his family separated from him… Well, I just wanted to take him home.

It’s ironic that his character is at the lowest point of his life and career, being alone and having failed to get the Letterman gig, but yet C.K. himself is hot off a couple of Emmys and is a respected commodity in television. Season 3 of Louie has some of the best work he has ever done. The fact that he pulled in some great cameos (Williams! Lynch! Poehler! Seinfeld!) is only icing on the cake.

Thanks John Landgraf of FX for giving Louis C.K. complete control of his show. It’s still unlike anything I’ve ever seen on any network. How refreshing.

The Glee Project

Season 2: A-
Series to date: A-

I hate the term “reality show.” When I think of reality TV, I think of The Bachelor or something lame like I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here! Then when you say reality competition, I immediately think of American Idol or Survivor, which aren’t quite the bottom of the barrel, but still not exactly satisfying television for me. The Glee Project deserves so much more attention than it gets. It’s better than the “reality” sub-genre it’s stuck in. It’s even far better – and far more rewarding – than Glee itself! The Glee Project is a refreshingly honest, intimate talent competition that blows American Idol out of the water, substituting smarmy coke-drinking celebrity judges with creative, nurturing mentors. No studio audience necessary, either — these kids bust their asses for Ryan Murphy, Zach Woodlee, Nicki Anders and Robert Ulrich. These charming, humble contenders answer to no one but them.

The Glee Project is enchanting, uplifting and exciting television. I sincerely hope there is a season 3.

The Newsroom

Season 1: B+

I can’t tell you how thrilled I am to have Aaron Sorkin back on the tube. I’m a big fan of all of his television projects (yes, including the deeply flawed but endlessly compelling Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip). None of his work has come close to the rousing perfection that was his first series, Sports Night. Sadly, not even The Newsroom reaches the heights set by that short-lived triumph. But the potential is definitely there.

The Newsroom, in its punchy, uneven first season, features a stellar cast delivering the finest work in years by esteemed actors like Jeff Daniels, Emily Mortimer and Sam Waterston. The first half of the show was kind of all over the place, unsure of its footing and experimenting with character dynamics. The overall initial feeling I had of this show was sort of schizophrenic (the romantic entanglements of the staff didn’t quite mesh well with the real-world news events), but as the show progressed, each subplot grew more fine-tuned. I’m not quite hinging on the suspense on whether Jim and Maggie will hook up, but I actually liked their characters more and more once the season wrapped up. Ditto the once-flaky, now multidimensional character of Sloan Sabbath (who’s on-air slipup caused a fantastic showdown with network president, Charlie Skinner).

In the end, a lot of things absolutely worked for me, especially the balance of comedy and drama. I knew Sorkin would pull through. Will the show be able to continue its path towards greatness? Whether or not it heads in that direction, I’m easily on board for season 2.

6 Comments

Filed under Crazy About TV, TV Report Card

Quick Take: Damages Seasons 3 and 4

Damages Seasons 3 and 4

Created by Glenn Kessler, Daniel Zelman, Todd A. Kessler

Oh Patty Hewes, you conniving little bitch. You better watch your back.

Hewes may be less of a backstabber in these two seasons but she still has her cold, wily ways. She’s a terrific character; complex, angry, overachiever and damned good at what she does. She’s not a Cruella de Ville (pun intended) but a human being with a past that can harden any individual. That’s the great thing about Damages - over the course of these four seasons, the writers have peeled many interesting layers of Patty Hewes. There are a lot of reasons why she is the way she is.

After the outstanding first season and the damned good second one, I feel that Damages season 3 falters a bit. I think the writers were struggling with keeping the twists fresh and ultimately went in over their heads. At this point in the game, we’ve come to expect that nothing is what it seems at first glance. (24 fell into the same rut; it’s how a show’s rigid structure can harm itself). One thing we can still expect from Damages is a remarkable cast acting the hell out of their meaty roles. In season three, there’s something undeniably appealing about Martin Short, as an oily lawyer, snaking his way around his client’s troubled family business. It’s a shady, layered role, a dramatic and welcome departure for Short. Lily Tomlin also fares well as the wife of the Bernie Madoff-esque tycoon who still supplies money to his family, even after his arrest for fraud. Campbell Scott is terrific as the son who rises to the occasion and “takes over” the family affairs. Meanwhile, Ellen and Patty deal with the ongoing mystery of Tom Shayes, which has a few intriguing bumps along the way. The twists and turns that are expected from Damages are not nearly as shocking and carefully plotted as in previous seasons, but the show remains a compelling, superbly acted piece of entertainment.

After three seasons (at 13 episodes apiece) on FX, the show decreased its episode count to 10 when it moved to Direct TV for season 4. And it made a tremendous difference. The 4th, penultimate season was its tightest and most enthralling season since the first one. Again, the outstanding cast has a lot to do with it. Not only do we have Dylan Baker at his sleazy best as a CIA agent who pulls some (illegal) strings for his own personal gain (it’s a nuanced performance by a reliably good actor), we also have a towering, magnificent John Goodman as the season’s major villain, a religious family man who made some bad judgment calls and tries to worm his way out of trouble. Goodman’s Howard Erickson is the show’s best character since Ted Danson’s Arthur Frobisher from the earlier seasons. The least the Emmy voters could have done was nominate Goodman for his performance here. And if that weren’t enough, we were given a strong arc involving a military extraction gone wrong, resulting in the deaths of three soldiers and the souring mental health of the sole survivor (played by the excellent Chris Messina). The great Judd Hirsch pops up as Hewes’s former mentor who can help crack the case. This season had taut storylines, surprising twists, and more of the great acting showcases we’ve come to expect from the show.

So despite the ups and downs of these four seasons, I’m relieved and thrilled that Damages is as good as it was when it started. The show’s fifth and final season may not be available on DVD for some time now, but I’ll be riding into that good night with high hopes.

Season 1: A-
Season 2: B+
Season 3: B-
Season 4: A-
Season 5: ?
Series to date: B+

2 Comments

Filed under Crazy About TV, Quick Takes

Emmy Awards Post Mortem

No Monday Movie Showcase today. Instead, I have some quick thoughts about last night’s Emmy Awards and, in keeping with the theme of TV, this week I will have a quick take on a few seasons of Damages and a Summer TV Report card. The Fall TV season has officially begin!

I only watch three awards shows — The Oscars, the Golden Globes and the Emmys. Some years, I don’t even watch any of them. Award shows are hugely unimportant; they have very little relevance to me and society in general. In 2 days, I always forget who actually won. But sometimes in years when there are good films and strong television, I tune in so I can watch Hollywood give self-congratulatory handjobs to one another because “you done good, kid!”  For a casual viewer of television, which is most of you, the Emmys are just a way of acknowledging that you either watch too much TV or not enough.

That being said, some really good shows were being honored last night so I knew I had to watch. I recorded the show but didn’t tune in til later in the evening, which is a practice I do for all award shows. Pacing is a major problem with these telecasts, and I eliminate the tedium by being able to zip through commercials, unnecessary categories (ahem, reality), and long-winded speeches.

So let’s get to it.

  • The highlight of the evening: Aaron Paul’s win and speech. Yes, I really rooted for Giancarlo Esposito for this one, whose Gus Fring was a real highlight on one of the greatest shows on television. But when Paul’s name was announced, I was disappointed for about 5 seconds, and then I was absolutely elated for this guy. Aaron Paul is the real deal, the genuine article. His emotional, heartfelt speech all but confirmed it.
  • I rolled my eyes when Jon Cryer won for Best Actor. I mean, is he really funnier than the other guys in the category? But then I realized… Jon Cryer is actually a funny guy (I’ve always liked him growing up), and he’s never in the tabloids or seeking out fame. He’s a down to earth guy who shows up for work and makes people laugh. So, good for you, Jon Cryer.
  • Shocked to see Kathy Bates showing up for the ceremony, after just hearing about her double mastectomy. This woman is awesome.
  • Can we please just change the name of the Emmys to the Louies, after Louis C.K.? This guy is endlessly brilliant and deserves all of the acclaim he gets.
  • I thought Jimmy Kimmel was pretty funny. He appeared confident, right at home on stage and played with audience responses well. The opening bit in the bathroom and In Memoriam…Jimmy Kimmel had me chuckling throughout.
  • I still think Breaking Bad is the be-all-and-end-all of drama shows, but seeing Homeland sweep up the major awards is something I cannot complain about. Damian Lewis, Claire Danes and Howard Gordon/Alex Gansa crafted a really well-done thriller. Bravo to Showtime for finally stepping up to the plate.
  • But Showtime is still not HBO. Go Game Change! The performances in that movie are pretty awesome.
  • Never watched Hatfields & McCoys, but I just may have to now. Not because they won a couple of Emmys but because I realized that I miss Kevin Costner. He doesn’t work nearly as often as he should. I’ve always liked him. And wow… seeing Tom Berenger up there was pretty cool. That’s another actor that just never stops working.
  • Julia Louis-Dreyfuss looks fantastic. I haven’t really watched her in anything since Seinfeld. Yes, I think it’s time to jump into Veep.
  • Some folks are harping on Modern Family for winning again. Yeah, I do wish they would spread the love a bit (umm, Parks and Rec? Please!), but the truth is, Modern Family still makes me laugh. A lot. I just love it.
  • Nipple covers. That is all.
  • Amy Poehler “switching speeches” with Julia Louis-Dreyfuss was utterly charming. Stephen Colbert tackling Jon Stewart before Stewart accepted his trophy was unexpectedly silly. It’s moments like these that could help inject some life into the usually dry Oscar telecasts.

Overall, solid show. Not a bad way to spend 90 minutes on Sunday night. What did everyone else think?

7 Comments

Filed under Crazy About TV, Random Musings

Quick Take: Jeff, Who Lives at Home

Jeff, Who Lives at Home (2012)

Written and Directed by Jay and Mark Duplass

Jeff, Who Lives at Home is a small, intimate film about a family floating in different directions in life, unhappy, insecure, indifferent. It’s like they are just waiting around for their lives to kick into gear. Susan Sarandon is the mother, and Jason Segel and Ed Helms are her two grown sons.

This type of movie is right up my alley. I was anticipating this for some time now.

And yet, it didn’t work for me at all.

Segel and Sarandon are perfectly pleasant and charming here, but whenever Helms shows up and does/says something stupid, the film grinds to a halt. Whenever the plot depends on sloppy coincidences to bring our family together, my heart just sinks. And don’t get me started with that maudlin climax. Those tears were not earned. Every emotion was forced, fake and false.

For a play on alliteration, this is the perfect opportunity to slap this film with an F, but I can’t bring myself to do it. Segel and Sarandon are just too good. Segel brings a sweet naïveté to his role as a simple man in need of some guidance. I’m a longtime fan of his, and he can clearly carry a film. And Sarandon, lovelier and graceful than ever, kind of feels like she’s in an entirely different movie. Her office romance felt as contrived as the rest of the film, but the camera simply loves her. She’s so easy on the eyes.

So thank Segel and Sarandon, breaths of fresh air, for keeping Jeff, Who Lives at Home from completely sinking to the bottom of the bay.

C-

6 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: The Future

The Future (2011)

Written and Directed by Miranda July

It’s been a long six years since Miranda July wowed me with her feature debut, Me and You and Everyone We Know. I had been greatly anticipating her next big-screen project. The Future arrived with lesser fanfare and mixed reviews. And having just viewed it, I can see exactly why.

The Future is far less accessible than her previous film. Complete with a scratchy, cutesy voice, July narrates some scenes from the perspective of a to-be-adopted cat. Also, her character is followed by her favorite yellow t-shirt. Hamish Linklater, who plays July’s boyfriend, stops time and has a conversation with the moon. Yes, Me and You and Everyone We Know wasn’t exactly conventional, but July goes much, much further off the reservation with The Future. I know July doesn’t do strange things for the sake of being strange. I believe she finds truth and meaning in the smallest, oddest things in life. She’s an artist; she makes bold choices, broad strokes and doesn’t fall victim to average or typical storytelling. In fact, I love this about her. She’s a brave, beautiful soul, and I’ll watch anything she does. There’s simply no one like her at all. Even if I don’t quite get what she’s doing, I know I’m getting something completely original and thoughtful with her.

I can’t recommend The Future to casual moviegoers, but die-hard fans of her first film will surely take away something positive from this viewing experience. They may even be charmed by it as I was.

B-

2 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Monday Movie Showcase: Me and You and Everyone We Know

ME AND YOU AND EVERYONE WE KNOW (2005)

PLOT

Several interlocking stories about love, sexual awakening and innocence lost in suburban Los Angeles

WHY I LOVE IT

Putting it mildly, Miranda July is an …. acquired taste. She’s a performance artist who specializes in the odd and peculiar things in life. She approaches her material with a childlike wonder, whether in book form, on stage, online or in movies. Me and You and Everyone We Know is her first feature and it’s a rapturous event that had me feeling alive, hopeful, and just fuzzy all over.

Within 15 minutes, you’ll know if this film is going to work for you or not. But if you stick with it, you may find yourself sort of falling in love with these characters, including July as a cab driver for the elderly who likes to meddle in her passengers’ lives. She’s also a performance artist who merges multimedia platforms to create love as art. She has an emotional connection with a local shoe salesman (the great John Hawkes, in a complete 180 from his sinister-creepy turn in the recent Martha Marcy May Marlene), who is sort of going through a mid-life shake-up of his own. His two young boys, meanwhile, are looking for love in all of the wrong places (they engage in an online chat with an anonymous woman about, of all things, poop). The older brother donates his body for “science” as he allows two girls to practice their oral sex skills on him. Those girls, by the way, are oddly entranced by a neighbor who happens to be a wanna-be pedophile.

The film may sound raunchy or hardcore but it’s far from it, really. It’s just odd and precious, gentle and sweet, random and just a little bit dirty. Most of all, it’s simply enchanting. It resonated with me. Me and You and Everyone We Know is a one of a kind, and I’m certain I’ll never see anything quite like it.

7 Comments

Filed under Monday Movie Showcase

Quick Take: Safe House

Safe House (2012)

Written by David Guggenheim
Directed by Daniel Espinosa

I don’t know why but I had high hopes for this one. Maybe it’s because I was fresh off the high of seeing Denzel Washington in the terrific thriller, Man on Fire, for the first time. Maybe because I really dig Ryan Reynolds as an actor. Maybe because I thought it looked like a solid, mindless action thriller.

So what happened? Why did this movie bore me to tears?

For one, seeing Brendan Gleeson and Vera Farmiga be completely wasted in such nondescript roles ticked me off. These are such enigmatic, fantastic actors and for them to be playing such one-dimensional characters whose actions make no sense whatsoever is an injustice to them and to us. It doesn’t help matters that the plot is more by-the-numbers than it makes out to be. And Washington and Reynolds — as good as they usually are — have done these performances before. They chose to bring nothing new to the table. So why should we care?

Safe House turned out to be as bland as its title. It’s a bummer, but whattaya gonna do?

C-

4 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: Game Change

Game Change (2012)

Written by Danny Strong
Directed by Jay Roach

From the writer, director and network that brought us the great, biting political comedy Recount back in 2008, comes a new project cut from the same cloth. Game Change is a whip-smart and absorbing account of the meteoric rise of Sarah Palin and how she affected the 2008 presidential election.

Woody Harrelson (who is having a fabulous run these days, isn’t he?) is Steve Schmidt, the aide to Senator John McCain (played by an uncanny Ed Harris). McCain has a very small chance of winning the election unless his team starts thinking outside of the box. They needed to shake things up. So they recruit Sarah Palin, the popular governor from Alaska, to run alongside McCain for the Republican party. No one on earth expected Palin to take off the way she did.

Palin is played straight by Julianne Moore in a fantastic award-worthy performance. They were not aiming for laughs, a la Tina Fey’s hilarious impersonation from Saturday Night Live. Game Change wanted to get under Palin’s skin. Moore and writer Danny Strong wanted to show us what Palin believed in and how she handled her surprising fame. I empathized with Palin, a woman who adored her family and cherished her job as Alaska’s leader. She was good at what she did. She was in her comfort zone. Once she reached for the bigger prize, she stumbled. She couldn’t hack it and was publicly ridiculed. No one deserves that kind of public lashing, even if her ego took her a little too far.

Game Change is a smart, perceptive, well-cast drama. HBO proved yet again to be the venue for fantastic original films.

A-

6 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: Tiny Furniture/Girls: Season 1

Tiny Furniture (2010)

Written and Directed by Lena Dunham

Girls: Season 1 (2012)

Created by Lena Dunham

I just spent the week with Lena Dunham.

Before my marathon viewing of season 1 of Girls followed by her first feature Tiny Furniture, I had no idea who the hell Lena Dunham was. But now I can’t wait to see her again. I want this woman in my life.

In 2010, she wrote, produced, directed and starred in Tiny Furniture, a minuscule independent dramedy about a young woman, fresh out of college, who moves in with her mom and sister so she can figure what to do with her life. After the surprising success of the film, Dunham — and co-producer Judd Apatow – brought her new similarly themed dramedy series Girls to HBO, where the first season just completed earlier this summer. Girls has a completely new set of characters and plot lines, but these characters could have easily walked from the movie set onto the TV show and blend right in. Dunham has a posse that seems to follow her wherever she goes, including the delightful Jemima Kirke (Charlotte in Tiny Furniture, Jessa in Girls, and equally ravishing in both) and the dry, biting Alex Karpovsky (Jed in Furniture, Ray in Girls). Even Furniture‘s Aura is cut from same cloth as Dunham’s Girls‘ alter ego Hannah Horvath.

I got wind of Dunham’s popularity when Girls premiered to rave reviews. So for several days, I was immersed in Dunham’s remarkably engaging world of insecurity and quirkiness, and her two projects blended together almost seamlessly. What I find interesting about the TV show and her first film is not only how remarkably similar they are but how smart and insightful the writing is. Dunham is in such dynamic control of her tone; she shows remarkable restraint and assuredness for someone who is just a rookie in show business.

I also admire her courage. For Girls, especially, which features copious amounts of sex and nudity, and Dunham — who would not be featured on the cover of Marie Claire any time soon — has no issues baring all for the camera. She’s a gorgeous beauty, curves and all, and I just love how comfortable she is in her skin, parading around in her underwear and ratty t-shirts.

So yes. I’m smitten. Like Jemima Kirke and Alex Karpovsky before me, I’ll follow Lena Dunham whereever she goes.

Tiny Furniture: B+
Girls: Season 1: A-

15 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes

Quick Take: The Dictator

The Dictator (2012)

Written by Sacha Baron Cohen, Alec Berg, David Mandel and Jeff Schaffer
Directed by Larry Charles

After the disappointment that was Bruno a few years ago, I went into this one with a little trepidation. The reviews seemed mixed, at best.

Thankfully, the brilliant artist that is Sacha Baron Cohen delivered the goods with The Dictator, an uproarious return to form from the team who brought us Borat, one of my favorite comedies of the last 10 years. This brisk 80-minute comedy does not hold anything back; Cohen hits all of the stereotypes, insults every race and taps into our fears and beliefs in this post-9/11 world we live in. He plays General Aladeen, the fascist leader of Wayida who orders the deaths of anyone who crosses him. He heads to the United States to address concerns involving his country’s nuclear weapons program and, needless to say, it doesn’t go very well. The Dictator wisely eschews the mockumentary/unscripted elements from his earlier films and keeps the narrative moving along on a more conventional path.

Anna Faris is a delight as the feminist who forms an unlikely bond with Aladeen, and Ben Kingsley plays it straight as his right-hand man with ulterior motives. Also popping up in funny cameos are John C. Reilly, Garry Shandling, Chris Elliott, Megan Fox, Edward Norton and Kathryn Hahn (“You two make a cute couple, but can you please do this later? When you’re not elbow deep in my vagina?”).

The ratio of successful laughs doesn’t match that of Borat, but The Dictator comes closer than I had anticipated. After all, Aladeen is a man of sparkling wisdom and insight.

“Give a man a vagina and he will shpichs for a day. Teach a man to use his hand as a vagina, and he will shpichs for a lifetime.”

How can I not love this guy?

B+

2 Comments

Filed under Quick Takes